3D Secure (3DS) was introduced to make online payments safer. By adding an authentication step at checkout, it helps merchants comply with Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) rules and reduces fraud losses. In theory, it protects both cardholders and merchants. In practice, however, it often introduces friction that hurts conversion and lowers approval rates.
The challenge is inconsistency. Some issuers enforce 3DS rigorously, others more loosely, and the customer experience varies from one market to the next. Merchants see abandoned checkouts when customers face unfamiliar steps or clunky issuer flows. Finance teams see acceptance rates fall, while fraud managers worry that relaxed enforcement opens the door to chargebacks.
This is the central trade-off: too much friction means lost sales, too little control means higher fraud and more disputes downstream. For enterprises processing payments across multiple regions and providers, that trade-off becomes harder to manage at scale.
To get it right, merchants need to think beyond “comply or not.” Optimizing 3DS requires operational levers: applying exemptions where allowed, using transaction risk analysis (TRA) to target checks, tokenizing cards to reduce repeat friction, and monitoring issuer performance with unified analytics.
In this article, we’ll look at how 3DS has evolved from its first version to 3DS2, what’s changed under SCA, and how merchants can use tools like exemptions, tokenization, and analytics to balance security with customer experience. Along the way, we’ll highlight how leading enterprises are turning 3DS from a compliance burden into a performance advantage.
What’s new: 3DS1 vs 3DS2 and why it matters
The first generation of 3D Secure (3DS1) was widely criticized for adding too much friction. Redirects, pop-ups, and forgotten passwords often left customers confused and more likely to abandon their purchase. Today, 3DS1 is effectively deprecated, and most payment providers – including Payrails – support only the latest versions.
3DS2 was designed to solve those problems. It introduced biometric authentication, improved step-up flows, and mobile-first design. The goal was a smoother, “frictionless” checkout experience that preserved security without interrupting the customer journey.
In practice, adoption has been uneven. Some issuers deliver clean, mobile-friendly flows; others still route customers through clunky redirects. Awareness among customers is also mixed — a prompt for biometric authentication feels natural to some but confusing to others. For merchants, the result is inconsistency: abandoned carts in some markets, higher authentication success in others, and little predictability at a global scale.
This is where measurement becomes critical. Unified analytics show which issuers are applying 3DS2 correctly and where authentication failures remain common. With this visibility, merchants can identify patterns, engage with PSPs or issuers to address problem areas, and track whether new version updates actually deliver the intended improvements.
As 3DS2 becomes the default standard, the next challenge is how to apply Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) in a way that protects against fraud without adding unnecessary friction. In the next section, we’ll take a look at the role exemptions can play in optimizing your 3DS strategy.
The regulatory lens: SCA and exemptions
Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) is a central requirement of the EU’s PSD2 regulation. For most electronic payments, merchants must apply two-factor authentication — typically delivered through 3D Secure (3DS). The goal is stronger fraud protection, but when merchants apply 3DS universally, approval rates can fall. Customers face more prompts, more step-ups, and in many cases, more abandoned transactions.
This is where exemptions matter. PSD2 allows certain transactions to bypass 3DS without breaking compliance. Examples include:
- Low-value payments below a defined threshold.
- Merchant-initiated transactions (MITs), such as recurring subscriptions or installments.
- Transaction Risk Analysis (TRA), which lets merchants apply their own fraud models to justify skipping extra authentication when risk is demonstrably low.
Handled correctly, these exemptions reduce unnecessary friction and help boost conversions. But they come with responsibilities: compliance managers must document the rationale for each exemption, prove they have appropriate safeguards in place, and review outcomes regularly. Issuers may also apply exemptions differently across markets, which creates additional variability.
Platforms like Payrails support the implementation of a more nuanced 3DS strategy by allowing merchants to centralize exemption logic and monitor outcomes by issuer, so exemptions are applied consistently across PSPs and regions. With unified visibility, merchants can see which exemptions are improving authorization rates, where issuers are rejecting them, and how well fraud models are performing in practice.
For enterprises, exemptions are the first lever in balancing security and conversion – but they’re not the whole story. To understand the business trade-off, merchants must connect SCA outcomes to their core KPIs: acceptance, fraud, and chargebacks.
The enterprise trade-off: Security vs conversion
For merchants, 3DS is not just about ticking a compliance box – it has a direct impact on business performance. Payments managers track declining acceptance rates, CFOs worry about lost revenue, and customers abandon checkouts when authentication feels clumsy or unnecessary. On the other hand, fraud managers know that relaxing authentication too far can lead to higher chargeback volumes, with disputes draining both margin and time.
The key is to make these trade-offs measurable. Enterprises should tie 3DS to their core payment KPIs:
- Acceptance rate: How often transactions succeed on the first attempt. If 3DS is applied universally without exemptions, acceptance rates often fall.
- Fraud rate: How often transactions later turn out to be fraudulent. Stronger authentication helps reduce fraud-driven disputes.
- Chargeback rate: The downstream effect of fraud prevention decisions. Skipping 3DS too often may boost conversion in the short term but increase chargeback volumes in the long term.
The balance looks very different by region. In Europe, PSD2 rules create a structured framework: SCA is mandatory, but exemptions allow merchants to control where friction is applied. In the US, issuers enforce 3DS far less predictably. Some apply it aggressively, others barely at all, leaving merchants caught between inconsistent issuer behavior and unpredictable approval outcomes. This unpredictability is where unified analytics prove especially valuable, since merchants need to compare acceptance, fraud, and chargeback trends side by side across issuers and regions.
Payrails’ unified analytics dashboard surfaces acceptance and fraud rates together with chargeback trends, giving merchants a clear view of the trade-offs at play. With this visibility, payments and compliance leaders can move from reacting to issuer rules to actively managing performance, armed with the data they need to make smarter decisions.
But understanding KPIs is only the first step. The next lever for reducing friction and improving consistency lies in tokenization: particularly in recurring and card-on-file payments.
Reducing friction with tokenization and recurring flows
Even when exemptions are applied correctly, recurring payments and card-on-file transactions can still run into challenges. Mandatory step-ups for every renewal add friction that frustrates loyal customers and puts renewal revenue at risk. For subscription businesses, a failed payment caused by repeated authentication can quickly translate into churn.
Tokenization offers a practical way to minimize these disruptions. With merchant-controlled tokens, sensitive card data is stored securely in a vault, and day-to-day systems process tokens instead of raw card details. This setup not only reduces PCI DSS scope but also supports exemptions for recurring or merchant-initiated transactions (MITs), cutting down on unnecessary 3DS prompts.
Network tokens add another layer of optimization. Issued by the card networks, they update automatically when a card is reissued or replaced, keeping payment credentials fresh for repeat charges. When combined with account updater services, network tokens reduce the chance of soft declines and help keep customer subscriptions active without repeated step-ups.
The net effect is fewer interruptions for customers, higher approval rates for merchants, and a smoother experience for Finance teams that otherwise see revenue leakage from failed recurring transactions.
Payrails orchestrates merchant-controlled and network tokens together, ensuring that recurring flows remain secure, up to date, and less exposed to unnecessary 3DS challenges.
While tokenization is a niche lever compared to broader exemption strategies, it plays an important role in high-volume recurring businesses where even small improvements in approval rates translate into significant revenue gains. The next challenge, however, is that 3DS performance doesn’t just vary by transaction type – it also differs dramatically by issuer and region.
Case study: See how InDrive increased payment approval rates by 11% using Payrails
Monitoring issuer and regional differences
One of the biggest frustrations for merchants is how differently issuers enforce 3DS. Two customers can attempt the same transaction – same amount, same product, same channel – but get completely different outcomes depending on their bank. In some markets, issuers deliver smooth biometric flows with high approval rates. In others, customers are redirected into clunky experiences that drive abandonment.
This variation isn’t limited to issuers; it also shows up regionally. In Europe, PSD2 has created a structured framework where SCA and exemptions follow consistent rules. In the US, by contrast, issuers apply 3DS far less predictably, as mentioned earlier. Some enforce it aggressively, while others barely require it at all, leaving merchants caught between inconsistent behaviors that impact both conversion and fraud prevention.
To navigate this complexity, merchants need visibility at the Bank Identification Number (BIN) level, not just by market or by PSP. BIN-level analytics reveal which issuers are approving transactions smoothly and which ones are causing unnecessary friction or failed authentications. With this granularity, merchants can spot patterns early, compare issuer performance across regions, and benchmark against peers.
The next step is to make this insight actionable. By sharing performance data with PSPs and issuers, merchants can push for improvements, and by feeding BIN-level intelligence into routing strategies, they can prioritize paths with the highest likelihood of success.
With Payrails, merchants can track issuer differences in real time, down to the BIN level, and feed those insights back into routing and strategy. This transforms 3DS from a black box into an area where merchants have leverage: turning unpredictable issuer behavior into a factor they can monitor, negotiate, and optimize against.
But monitoring alone isn’t enough. To move beyond firefighting, merchants need to operationalize 3DS with clear processes, SLAs, and anomaly detection.
From firefighting to strategy: Making 3DS operationally efficient
For many enterprises, 3DS still feels like an obstacle rather than a tool. Teams scramble when authentication rates suddenly dip, when issuers change enforcement without warning, or when entire regions show unexplained drops in approvals. Without structure, these issues get treated as ad hoc firefights – draining resources and distracting from product delivery.
The alternative is to operationalize 3DS as a managed process. That starts with service-level agreements (SLAs) for authentication success and response times. When issuers fall below agreed thresholds, merchants can flag issues early and hold partners accountable.
Second, merchants should deploy anomaly detection across 3DS events. A sudden spike in authentication failures with one BIN, or a dip in approvals in a specific region, is often the first sign of a misconfiguration or issuer-side issue. Early detection means merchants can reroute transactions, escalate with partners, or apply exemptions before revenue takes a hit.
Finally, build root cause analysis into regular reporting. Failed authentications, fraud-related declines, and disputes should be tracked together. This provides the context to answer critical questions: Did a drop in approval rate stem from issuer enforcement? Was it a technical issue in the authentication flow? Or was it fraud driving more 3DS step-ups?
When these processes are in place, 3DS stops being a source of constant surprises and instead becomes another lever in payment performance management.
Payrails enables SLA-based monitoring of 3DS flows, consolidating them alongside chargeback and fraud data in unified KPI dashboards. By connecting operational alerts to dispute and fraud outcomes, merchants not only respond faster but also strengthen prevention upstream.
With operations under control, the final step is to turn 3DS from a compliance necessity into a source of competitive advantage: bringing security, conversion, and customer experience fully into alignment.
From trade-offs to competitive advantage
3DS was introduced to make payments safer, but for many merchants it has felt like a drag on conversion. With 3DS2, exemptions under Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), and better issuer flows, the potential now exists to reduce fraud without sacrificing customer experience. The key is treating 3DS not as a box to tick, but as a lever to manage.
Enterprises that monitor and optimize 3DS systematically gain both resilience and revenue. Exemptions cut unnecessary friction in Europe, while analytics help tame the inconsistencies of US issuers. Tokenization keeps recurring payments smooth, and BIN-level monitoring exposes issuer performance differences before they damage approval rates. Most importantly, optimizing 3DS up front also helps prevent fraud-related chargebacks downstream – reducing both disputes and their operational cost.
Payrails helps enterprises go beyond fragmented PSP dashboards by combining unified analytics, tokenization, network token orchestration, and reconciliation in one operating system for payments.
Merchants that master 3DS don’t just avoid compliance headaches – they win more customers, recover more revenue, and turn payment security into a competitive advantage.
FAQs
How does 3D Secure impact customer experience?
3D Secure adds an extra authentication step at checkout. When implemented well, it reduces fraud without disrupting the customer journey. But inconsistent issuer flows and unnecessary step-ups can frustrate customers and cause drop-offs. Merchants who monitor issuer performance and apply exemptions correctly see smoother experiences and higher approval rates.
How does 3DS affect total payment volume (TPV) and investor reporting?
If too much friction is applied, approval rates fall and fewer payments are completed — directly reducing TPV. This impacts revenue recognition and investor reporting, as Finance teams must explain fluctuations in acceptance and fraud levels. Merchants that optimize 3DS with exemptions and analytics can stabilize TPV and present a stronger performance story to investors.
What is the difference between 3DS1 and 3DS2 for merchants?
3DS1 relied on static passwords and clunky redirects, leading to abandoned transactions and poor customer experience. 3DS2 supports biometrics, step-up authentication, and mobile-friendly flows. For merchants, 3DS2 means the potential for higher approvals and less friction, though issuer adoption and customer awareness still vary across markets.
Why does Strong Customer Authentication create friction?
SCA requires two-factor authentication for most electronic payments under PSD2. While this strengthens security, it introduces extra steps into checkout. If 3DS is applied universally without exemptions, customers face repeated prompts, slowing the process and increasing cart abandonment.
How can SCA exemptions improve authorization rates?
Exemptions allow certain low-risk or recurring transactions to bypass 3DS without breaking compliance. Examples include low-value purchases, subscriptions, or payments cleared through transaction risk analysis. Applied correctly, exemptions reduce unnecessary friction, preserve conversion, and still meet regulatory requirements.
What happens when 3DS authentication fails?
If a 3DS challenge fails, the payment is usually declined. This not only costs the sale but can frustrate customers who may abandon future purchases. By tracking authentication success rates by issuer and region, merchants can identify where failures are concentrated and adjust routing or exemption strategies to improve outcomes.
How does transaction risk analysis balance fraud prevention and conversion?
Transaction risk analysis (TRA) uses fraud models to assess the risk of each payment. Low-risk payments can be exempted from 3DS, while higher-risk ones are stepped up for extra authentication. This balance helps merchants reduce fraud chargebacks without imposing friction on every customer.
How should merchants measure acceptance and fraud rates under 3DS?
Merchants should track acceptance rate, fraud rate, and chargeback rate side by side. Acceptance shows how many payments succeed, fraud rate shows how many later prove illegitimate, and chargeback rate reflects disputes. Unified analytics, such as those offered by the Payrails platform, help payments teams monitor these KPIs across issuers and regions.
Can tokenization reduce friction in recurring 3DS transactions?
Yes. Tokenization replaces sensitive card data with secure tokens, which can be used for recurring or merchant-initiated transactions. This supports SCA exemptions and reduces the need for repeated 3DS challenges. Network tokens further keep credentials updated, cutting down soft declines and improving renewal success.
I am the text that will be copied.
.png)
